1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VMariaS [17]
2 years ago
12

Consider the following scenario: Joe Pretend is traveling from California to his home in Texas. While he is in the middle of Ari

zona he stops to fill up his car with gas at a 7-11 in Phoenix. Steve Badguy jumps in Joe's car and drives away. Joe comes out of the 7-11 to find his car missing. Joe walks to the local police station for help. Officer Smith tells Joe that since he is not a citizen of the state of Arizona they cannot help him. How does the Constitution protect Joe? What clause in article IV helps Joe in this situation? (4 sentences)
Law
1 answer:
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]2 years ago
8 0

The Constitution protects Joe in this situation by requiring that he be treated with the same rights as citizens of California according to Section 2 of Article IV.

<h3>Section 2 of Article IV </h3>
  • Outlines the rights and priviledges of citizens in various states.
  • States that citizens of the U.S. will have the same rights in a state as citizens of that state.

Joe therefore has the same rights as a California citizen which means that the police have to help him in this situation.

Find out more on Article IV at brainly.com/question/1115164.

You might be interested in
A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus. tria
podryga [215]

Answer:

Habeas corpus.

Explanation:

Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation.

Therefore, when a judge with competent jurisdiction decides on an issue, his or her decision is final and can only be changed (upturned) by another court ruling.

This ultimately implies that, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.

A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus.

Additionally, habeas corpus ensures protection for an individual from imprisonment without being charged legally with a crime. The individual reports his or her illegal (unlawful) imprisonment or detention to a court in order to regain freedom.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which option runs counter to the classical theory of criminology?
enot [183]

Answer:

The option that runs contrary to the classical theory of criminology is (A) Punishment should be certain

Explanation:

The key principle of Classical theory Of Criminology are

  1. <u>Rationality</u>:-This principle states that people commit crime at their own wish/will.
  2. <u>Hedonism</u>:The principle of hedoism states that people seek pleasure and minimize their pain by committing crime.
  3. <u>Punishment </u>:As per this principle punishment work as a deterrent to crime.
  4. <u>Human Right:</u>This principle states that the punishment given should not be harsh rather it should be swift.

The answer of the above question is (A) Punishments should be certain.

7 0
3 years ago
What can you expect when you get stopped by a cop.
MrMuchimi

Answer:

if a police car is following you with its siren swearing or emergency lights flashing pull over to the right quickly but safely and come to a complete stop in a safe place.

Explanation:

this is a true fact about life when you're driving

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which of the following is not a resource for lawyers to determine the appropriate response to a situation
VMariaS [17]
Idek sorry dude i wish i could help
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Boyd files a suit in a federal district court against Cathy. Cathy loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
ikadub [295]

Answer:

not required to hear the case.

Explanation:

The United States Court of Appeals  is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.

In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Of the following countries, which one is most likely to report the highest murder rate?
    9·2 answers
  • What is criminal contempt of court vs civil contempt of court?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about criminal cases?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the difference between exclusive jurisdiction and concurrent jurisdiction
    15·1 answer
  • Is factual causation and legal causation mean the same thing? true or false
    15·2 answers
  • What types of weapons were used in the shooting?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms refers to bloodstains that are not visible to the naked eye?
    11·2 answers
  • How can you drop two eggs the fewest amount of times, without them breaking?
    15·2 answers
  • Are we doing enough to tackle racism? <br> Let me know your opinions.
    12·2 answers
  • A law office manager assists the attorney with the delivery of legal services.. Group of answer choices
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!