Carnegie beloved that industrialization benefited entire societies, while Marx believed that it only benefited a small number of people
Puritans did not agree with the Anglican church so the wanted to change it. They could do that in Massachusetts. Church leaders led the local government and everyone in the colony had to pay to support the Puritan church. - www.manythings.org.
This is a complex question, but generally I would say that it's true.
For example, they would aim at laws that make economy grow, while keeping fair working rights. They also introduce measures to prevent financial crashes, which are very hard on the societies.Only if goverments are corrupt or not democratic would they not do this.
Mary Tsukamoto quotation gave a contrasting view about the Executive Order 9066 on the Japanese Americans.
<h3>Who is Mary Tsukamoto?</h3>
She was an author that took the initiative to follow her beliefs and was famous for expressing her opinion on the Executive Order 9066 delivered by Franklin Roosevelt for the Japanese internment.
Because she was Japanese American civil rights activist, she conducted series of interviews and expresses her opinion on the decision taken by Franklin Roosevelt.
Read more about Mary Tsukamoto
brainly.com/question/23828707
#SPJ1
<span>Iwo Jima - although not strictly a stepping stone it gave the US an airbase that was reasonably far forward and at the same time deprived the Japanese of an airbase allowing bombing raids on mainland Japan to proceed with less interference. </span>