Answer:
confidence
Explanation:
Do not be afraid to look at your faults because even if you don't look at your faults it will be found out one day and it's good to tell your faults, being truthful is good. Lying brings you nothing and being truthful makes you make your worried thoughts away. S it's always better to look at you faults.
Have a great day/night.
Answer:
C. "That year [1999] was the first time I saw snow. I played in the
wondrous white stuff until my fingers and toes were frozen," wrote
the author.
Explanation:
A. is not the right answer. The verb is the key part of the sentence and can’t be put in the explanation in the brackets. If there is no verb, the sentence without brackets couldn’t be complete.
B. is not the right answer. Snow is mentioned in the first sentence of the speech, therefore it is implied that “wondrous white stuff” is snow, which means there is no need for explanation in the brackets.
<u>C. is the right answer.</u> <u>In this case, the information in the brackets simply completes the initial sentence, giving the readers fuller knowledge of the matter.</u> Yet, the sentences would work on their own even without the information in the brackets. <u>Brackets and the information between them only serve to explain to us what “that year” means for the author.</u>
D. is not correct. The brackets saying I refer to the author are not needed here, as that is explained by the “wrote the author” at the end.
Answer:
Into interrogative sentence:
Does everybody know the name of Tagore?
Explanation:
Simply, "Interrogative sentences" are sentences that ask questions. Whenever we talk about interrogative questions, we are referring to sentences that tend to interrogate. During interrogative discourse, questions make up such sentences.
The above sentence can also be stated as:
Does anyone knows the name of Tagore?
It's interrogative.
Answer:
it means to get least or smallest.
Which of the following is the LEAST important activity when protecting human subjects in international research?
A. Determining if the research might present unique risks to subjects given local socio-economic conditions.
B. Considering local customs, norms, and laws.
C. Assessing transportation conditions
D. Consulting with members of the community from which subjects will be recruited.
Answer:
The least important activity when protecting human subjects in international research is assessing transportation conditions.
Explanation:
- Some of the other important activities when protecting human subjects in international research are determining if the research might present unique risks to subjects given local socio-economic conditions
- Considering local customs, norms, and laws because proper international research should check whether we are following the laws, basic rules and all the other formalities.
- It should be consulting with members of the community from which subjects will be recruited.
- Assessing transportation conditions also important but when we comparing it to the other activities it is least important.
