The correct answer is A) Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?
The other options of the question are B) Who pay for this research and what possible motivations would they have to skew the results in a way that would benefit them? C) What are the average mortality rates associated with diabetes and does this risk offset the benefits of sitting comfortably at work? D) How did the researchers measure how many hours the subject sits per day and what qualifies as an official diabetes diagnosis?
A new high-profile study reports a strong connection between how long people sit every day and how likely they are to develop diabetes. The question that best represents a critical examination of the research is " Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?"
A critical examination is the kind of evaluation approach that uses a systemathic and logical way to understand the phenomenon at study. The issue is studied in a systematic way to analyze the content and the variables in order to find the best alternative for the solution. That is why the question "A" best represents critical examination.
<span>What important question do the various research techniques lack the ability to answer? Did consumers purchase the product because of viewing the producers ads?</span>
<span>Besides asking, where did you find out about us, it is very hard for a research team to use techniques to find out if they viewed the companies ad's before making the purchase. It's hard to know if they saw and actually watched the commercial on T.V. or if they read about it in the magazine on purpose.
</span>
Answer:
The advantage is that the person under different class, gender and other categories of identity have different legacy from their ancestor. They learn skills according on the basis of their background. And maybe someone else from different background cannot learn skills as much perfectly as the person from background.
For example:
It is easy for a farmer's children to learn farming more detailed rather than the children of barber.
But in modern world, anybody can learn whichever skills they want through the internet. But to some extinct it offers a distinct advantage.
I believe that the answer is C. Democratic
