1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notsponge [240]
3 years ago
14

What was similar about the ways the North and the South treated slaves

Social Studies
1 answer:
sergey [27]3 years ago
7 0
Nothing. <span>Slaves in the north </span>were not<span> treated better than in the south.</span>
You might be interested in
What does a 2-m shelf look like?
Gnom [1K]

Answer: this is how a 2-m shelf look like. Check the image

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The most northern state in the mountain states region is _____. Montana Wyoming Colorado
miss Akunina [59]
The most northern state is Montana
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
according to karl marx, social stratification in a capitalist society always involves: a. class conflict. b. the abolition of wo
drek231 [11]
The answer, I believe, is A. Class Conflict.
3 0
3 years ago
What do you know about asexuality? Do you believe that this is a legitimate sexual orientation or that some people are born with
castortr0y [4]
Asexuality is a condition where a person doesn't develop any/enough sexual attraction towards other people , causing them have very little or almost none of sexual activities

Personally , i believe it's more of psychological thing. Probably some events in the past causing them to have this sexual preference

That's being said, everyone have every rights to be happy. whether they want to date or don't want to date, they can do whatever they like

hope this helps
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In ___________, the Supreme Court held that if a person accused of a felony cannot afford an attorney, one must be made availabl
    11·2 answers
  • Miller (1989) found that in day care centers, _________ varied according to the socioeconomic status of the center's clientele (
    7·2 answers
  • Adam Smith suggested that an invisible had guides market economies. In this analogy, what is the baton that the invisible hand u
    7·1 answer
  • What effect did the arrival of the Jesuits have on the Chinese?
    5·1 answer
  • In writing our creative brief, which question do we answer so that we can connect target and brand in the most compelling way? a
    12·1 answer
  • Cuneiform one of the earliest forms of writing was probably developed as a means of keeping records of
    10·1 answer
  • Need 6-10<br> Need help I stuck
    14·2 answers
  • Porque se le concidio a rosas el poder publico?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a cause or effect of the rock cycle?
    8·1 answer
  • How was the Supreme Court going to rule in Muhammad alis case at first
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!