Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
1. Civil
2.military
3. Constitutional
4.military
5. Constitutional
6. Civil
7. Constitutional
8. Juvenile
9. Constitutional
10. Constitutional/juvenile
Answer:
well talk to them about it, explain the situation to the manager and demand an explaination back
Answer: because she can’t speak or write English, she is “disqualified” to become an U.S. citizen.
Explanation: to become a U.S. citizen it is required to be able to read, write, speak English and have knowledge and an understanding of U.S. history and government (civics)
