1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rus_ich [418]
3 years ago
7

Pháp luật trong việc tác động đến yếu tố đầu ra của quá trình sản xuất nông nghiệp

Law
1 answer:
Aleks04 [339]3 years ago
8 0

answer is filled belowjdjdjdjjdjdjdj

You might be interested in
Please help, will give brainliest :)
lesantik [10]

Answer:

Yes as an investigaiter uderstanding Agathas motive would be important because she coud be getting the water cause she is realy be thirsty or she could be getting it to taget  Eric by using the water excuse used to spy on him so hearing her motive would help me put as an investigator.

AS a jury it would be important to hear Agatha´s motive because I can hear why she was trespasing to get the water because she could be dehydrated and need the water. For a jury to hear her story would make to choose the choice of guilty or inicent and alos so she gets a chance to speak for herself then from what a investigator found.

4 0
3 years ago
On January 1 to Matthew being paid 67,400 for sound equipment the band estimate it will use this equipment for five years and wi
inn [45]

Answer: I do not understand.

What is the question that I am supposed to solve?

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
The US Constitution upholds the rights to trademarks and copyrights.<br> True<br> False
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The US Constitution upholds the rights to trademarks and copyrights.

8 0
3 years ago
Who is the father of legal medicine in the Philippines?​
kodGreya [7K]
Paolo Zacchia is the father of legal medicine in the Philippines
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which government function would most likely be provided by County government?
    7·1 answer
  • After the initial walk-through, who is now in authority of the crime scene, securing the safety of both people and crime
    15·1 answer
  • The ancient Greeks practiced_______ by allowing people to vote and government issues
    11·2 answers
  • The Department of Environmental Protection would be most likely to handle what responsibilities of local government?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes "sleep-driving"?
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it important for someone accused of a crime to have rights ?
    8·1 answer
  • Who owns the alcoholic beverages of a private club?
    12·1 answer
  • One of the legal definitions of intoxication in texas
    7·1 answer
  • What is domestic law.
    5·1 answer
  • Your organization is an organic food supplier with employees in the following jurisdictions:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!