Answer:
30
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Total utility consuming the 2 widgets = 240
Total utility consuming the 3 widgets = 270
So by considering the above information, the marginal utility of consuming the third widget is
= Total utility consuming the 3 widgets - Total utility consuming the 2 widgets
= 270 - 240
= 30
Basically we deduct the total utility consumes 2 widgets from the total utility consumes 3 widgets
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statement, if true, that would explain the analysts' predictions would be "the Producer Price Index has been steadily increasing over the past few months."
That is what would have been the factor that supports the forecast. Although inflation has been constant at low levels, what changed was the Producer Price Index that is moving up. This factor could modify the results despite inflation is stable at this moment. When inflation is high, it directly affects the price of goods and the consumer.
It is an example of an intrinsic reward.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The occurrence given above is a case of AN INTRINSIC REWARD.
There are two types of remuneration, inborn and extraneous prize. An inborn prize is a sort of remuneration which is by and by picked up when one accomplishes a by and by set objective. An intrinsic reward is close to the individual who is occupied with a specific action.
For example, in the situation given over, the natural prize is the fulfillment and the satisfaction which Casey feels. An extraneous prize is a sort of remuneration that is given to one by a more significant position authority because of good execution.
<span>A party who agrees to act on behalf of another person or party is called an agent.</span>
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B