According to research by Taylor and her colleagues (1984), <u>perceived control</u> is likely to reduce stress related to a negative life event such as cancer.
Explanation:
Shelley Taylor and her colleagues contributed to the effects of perceived control in the treatment of cancer.
Perceived control is the feeling or a belief by a person which determines his/her own inner state or behavior and influence and modify his/her or one’s own environment in order to bring about the desired outcome.
In the treatment of cancer, perceived control of behavior acts as a control strategy to deal with the immense amount of stress it causes to a person. This provides emotional well being and stability by enhancing the ability and preparing a person to cope up with the stress.
This in turn makes him/her to be mentally strong to bear the stress, feel less pain, and to be supportive with the treatment. This also reduces the impact of stress on physiological parameters like blood pressure, heart rate etc and improves the overall health of the patient.
Perceived control can also be used to cope with stress induced by negative life events like loss of someone dear, joblessness, marital or relational issues, chronic diseases etc
Answer:
The emphasis on emotion and instinct
Explanation:
Emotion: It is defined as a composite state of feeling that results in psychological and physical changes that affect behavior and thought processes. According to David G. Meyers, a person's emotion includes expressive behaviors, conscious experience, and physiological arousal.
The three main components of emotions are physiological, cognitive, and behavioral.
Instinct describes a set of behaviors which is unlearned and being placed in motion because of the environmental trigger.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Causation fallacy (Oversimplification or exaggeration fallacy)
This fallacy is also known as fallacy of reduction or multiplication
Explanation:
The oversimplification or exaggeration fallacy is used to appeal the fact that one single act would unchain several consequences of the same type without any cause to link it as a real proof of the possible occurrence. In this case, it is simple a prediction that is not based on any type of fact or scientific evidence to prove that this will certainly happen.
There are two types of choices when one makes a vote:
- <u>The Rational Choice:</u> A "rational" voter is conscious that voting is a personal right that is attributed to each and every one of the citizens of a given country. It is up to that voter's criteria to discern which candidate to vote for.
- <u>The Collective Voting Choice:</u> A "collective" voter will probably tend to conform with a group he or she belongs and vote according to the choice that the group has convened to be the best. People that belong to political parties or other organizations tend to be collective voters.
Regarding the case mentioned in the question, when a voter assesses a candidate's past performance, regardless of the political affiliation of this candidate, he is engaging in a "rational" vote.
The first answer is correct.
Serious crimes are conducted in the state court system unless the charges involve multiple states, non-citizen immigrants, or a foreign ambassador.
