Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is FALSE that Jeremy Bentham and the rest of the utilitarians believe that the principle of utility should be applied to humans only, excluding the animals.
This is evident when Jeremy Bentham and other utilitarians argued that Principal of Utility is based on the belief that the action of individuals is good in as much it leads to the happiness of the individual involved.
And the application of the principle of utility to animals (other than human) is sufficient only if during the exploitation of animals, the animals experience happiness more than pain.
Helping children know their own feelings and express them, helping them achieve altered emotional states without drugs, and teaching them to feel valued, accepted, and wanted are all presumed to be ways of reducing drug use is affective education.
Affective education is essential for an effective student studying. A scholar who has no shallowness issues fosters desirable organization relationships and precise institution relationships translate to a community of folks who are concerned with each other.
Effective education is conducive gaining knowledge of this is instrumentally desirable. The value of education is characterized by way of its instrumental goodness and intrinsic goodness: closing updated: might also four, 2020.
Learn more about affective education here brainly.com/question/14271740
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: No, depressed people in Eastern cultures do not devalue themselves like depressed people in Western cultures.
Eastern culture place a really high value on hardwork more than the western culture. So, people in eastern culture tend to see the act of succumbing to depression as being weak, which make them tend to deal it by working even harder to accomplish positive in life.
Europe kind of has two Governments, but first, America is a Republic, you go to court for stuff so you can be justified guilty or innocent. On the other hand, Europe is a monarchy, as well as its a presidential republic. I'm sorry if this isn't what you're looking for but this is what I know.
<span>The answer is "Political participation and The Internet".
</span>
There is a developing literature investigating the part of the Internet in impacting levels and styles of political participation. Notwithstanding, it isn't yet clear why the Internet is seen as a medium that can, at any rate conceivably, increment support. In addition, putting the emphasis on the Internet as an innovation as opposed to on its data and correspondence capacities flags an inclination for mechanical determinism.