We know from the question that John can drive 37.6 miles per 1 gallon in the city, and 42.3 miles per gallon on the highway. Therefore, B is correct because the other options are just incorrect and contradict the statements made in the question. John wouldn't use 37.6 gallons of gas to drive a single mile, that just doesn't make sense. B. John's car uses 1 gallon of gas to drive 37.6 miles in the city.
Answer: C) H0 : μ = 250 , Ha: μ < 250
Step-by-step explanation:
The questions is incomplete. The correct question is
A restaurant advertises that its burritos weigh 250 g. A consumer advocacy group doubts this claim, and they obtain a random sample of these burritos to test if the mean weight is significantly lower than 250 g. Let u be the mean weight of the burritos at this restaurant and ĉ be the mean weight of the burritos in the sample. Which of the following is an appropriate set of hypotheses for their significance test? Choose 1 answer:
A) H0 : x = 250 , Ha : x < 250
B) H0 : x = 250 , Ha : x > 250
C) H0 : μ = 250 , Ha: μ < 250
C) H0 : μ = 250 , Ha: μ > 250
Solution:
The null hypothesis is the hypothesis that is assumed to be true. The restaurant advertises that its burritos weigh 250. This is the null hypothesis. 250 is the population mean,μ . Thus, the null hypothesis is
H0 : μ = 250
The alternative hypothesis is what the researcher expects or predicts. The consumer advocacy group tests if the mean weight is significantly lower than 250g. This is the alternative hypothesis. It is expressed as
H0 : μ < 250
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
this is just common sense. if you would have tried you could have easily answered this yourself.
the sequence starts with 6. that is a1.
so, the formula simply has to add "something" to 6.
therefore, A and D are out.
and then we see immediately that the sequence is built by subtracting 4 (or adding -4) for every step.
so, we need to add multiples of -4.
therefore, only B is correct (C adds multiples of +4).
