Answer:
Modest short term deterrent, but will need mass executions to be effective
Explanation:
The question has already been answered but I guess you need an explanation.
In the deterrence theory by Professor Land and his colleagues, they assumes that offenders are rational, I.e. they know the law and the penalties attached to defaulting the law..
They're are three points to take note of in this study;
1. For execution to have a deterrent effect, then it means a huge number of execution must have taken place
2. Most of any deterrent effect of execution of homicide occurs immediately after the execution is made public
3. 5 to 10 homicides would deterred in a year if there are 10 to 20 executions using 0.5 homicides deterred on a monthly basis.
An independent entity whose purpose it is to oversee cross-border trade issues and global business practices is called the World Trade Organization (WTO).
World Trade Organization (WTO), is a global regulatory body with its headquarters in Geneva. To replace the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, it was established in 1995. (GATT).
Like its predecessor, it seeks to promote international trade and lower trade obstacles. It also negotiates and puts into effect new agreements while keeping an eye on members' compliance with GATT rules.
The WTO is criticized for allegedly undermining national sovereignty by serving the interests of powerful multinational corporations and for encouraging trade liberalization that harms the environment and lowers living standards for low-skilled workers in developing nations, among many other grievances. The WTO has more than 145 members at the start of the twenty-first century.
Learn more about World Trade Organization here:
brainly.com/question/13650479
#SPJ4
1.A women was known a a king rather than a queen because when thutmes died Hatshepsut took her nephews position as ruler and then declare her self as king until she die.
2. To have 900 brother and sister would be very cool but at the same time kinda of difficult to live with.
No, i do not think it's a good idea.
If the president could control the flow of information in the internet, He basically can promote only the sites that are suitable to his Agenda and demoting the ones that don't.
This situation is very similar to a Tyrannical Government that forced its people into only thinking a certain way.
