La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
La pregunta está incompleta ya que no ofrece opciones, referencias o un contexto en particular.
Sin embargo, haciendo una investigación extensa, podemos decir que se refiere a la situación que se vive en los mercados públicos en Perú, donde las aglomeraciones son comunes en estos mercados públicos.
¿Cuál es el conflicto que se presenta en esta situación?
El conflicto que se presenta es que las personas no están respetando el distanciamiento social al que ha invitado el gobierno para minimizar los contagios en esta época de pandemia. Al existir esas aglomeraciones, la gente se expone al contagio y muchos locatarios de esos mercados se han contagiado.
¿Por qué ocurre?
Esto ocurre porque la gente tiene necesidad de trabajar para ganar un dinero. La mayoría de esas personas viven al día. Si no trabajan, no comen. de igual manera, mucha gente de escasos recursos tiene que comprar su comida todos los días porque no tienen refrigeradores o electricidad en su casas.
¿Qué solución podría darse?
El gobierno podría ser más sensible a esta situación y no mandar a la fuerza policíaca porque eso genera más desobediencia y confrontaciones. El gobierno podía establecer algunos programas sociales que ayuden a la gente pobre del Perú.
Carl Rodgers believes that most psychological problems are as a result of experiencing conditional positive regard, rather than unconditional positive regard.
<h3>What did Carl Rodgers believe?</h3>
Carl Rodgers believed that people would have less psychological problems if they got unconditional positive regard.
Instead, they get conditioned positive regard which means that them being accepted is based on something they do rather than who they are.
Find out more on Carl Rodgers at brainly.com/question/25488008
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison can be regarded as an icon that helps to give more strength to the federal judiciary through the establishment of power of judicial review, these is a medium whereby there could be declaration of
legislation by federal courts as along with executive as well with administrative actions and the inconsistent that is associated with the U.S. Constitution and therefore null and void.This judicial review which was supreme Court case, can be regarded as one that was strengthen in 1803 by
Marbury vs Madison, this can be explained as how the courts are been given power so they can make law as well as other amendments which are regarded as been on violation of United States constitution
Answer:
The response is that anthropologists take an etic approach.
Explanation:
One set of concepts that is important in cultural analysis in anthropology is the idea of emic and etic. Emic refers to the close cultural understandings and fine detail you get from gaining an insider's view of culture, whereas etic refers to viewing a culture essentially as an outsider, from a perspective that can make larger comparisons of similarities and differences with other cultures. The notion is that you gain different insights depending on the perspective because from the etic view, for example, you are taking an outsider's view and you may see patterns and similitudes that somebody from within the culture can't see.
<span>Due to the fact that the Great Leap Forward
was not based on any sound economic analysis, but simply unrealistic
output targets set by Mao Zedong and based on the ideology of Maoism,
one is able to contribute its failure to the lack of central planning by
the Chinese government, which encapsulates various other causes thats what i can remeber hope it helps</span>
