...........................................................
...............................................
..............................
................
........
....
..
.
.........................................................
.............................................
......................
........
.....
..
.
Answer: A.exceed units sold
Explanation:
In Absorption Costing, All costs be it Fixed or Variable that are directly related to production are considered when computing the Cost of Production.
Under Variable Costs however, only variable Costs are considered for the computing of Cost of Production.
This difference in consideration of costs under each method leads to difference in income determination under each method.
Under Absorption Costing, fixed manufacturing costs are apportioned on produced units and the costs are only recovered when the units are sold but under variable costing, fixed manufacturing costs are treated as period costs and are therefore charged to the Income statement.
This means that, the amount of income under absorption costing will be more than the amount of income under variable costing when units manufactured exceed units sold.
Answer:
6.4%
Explanation:
we need to divide this investor's income in two parts:
- dividends are not taxed = $5,000 x 5% = $250
- capital gains = (selling price - basis) x (1 - tax rate) = ($4,975 - $4,900) x (1 - 15%) = $75 x 85% = $63.75
total after-tax gains = $250 + $63.75 = $313.75 / $4,900 = 0.064 ≈ 6.4%
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": set aside any award.
Explanation:
Arbitrators are individuals without the range of judges that are called in disputes to resolve a matter before taking it to court. Similar to trials, each party involved in the dispute present their defense in front of the arbitrator who promotes the mutual agreement between the two parties but, if that does not happen, the arbitrator provides a resolution that tends to be definite.
<em>Arbitrators must be impartial. Thus, if the arbitrator meets with one of the parties and, eventually, the decision of that case favors that party, the court can take away any reward provided until an investigation is conducted.</em>