<span>it requires a company or individual divide resources on multiple targets rather than one. Therefore, one must use these resources more efficiently because he or she is using the same amount, usually concentrated on one target, on multiple. A company should only use this strategy if it is extremely confident in its ability to market simultaneously to multiple groups.</span>
Answer:
Global marketing strategy
Explanation:
A global marketing strategy (GMS) is a strategy that encompasses countries from several different regions in the world and aims at coordinating a company's marketing efforts in markets in these countries. A GMS does not necessarily cover all countries but it should apply across several regions.
Competing on a global basis allows customers worldwide to be better-informed and more focused on the products and services you offer. Creating a comprehensive global marketing strategy also allows your company to adapt quickly wherever needed based on customer demands and trends in the global marketplace.
Each marketing strategy can communicate to a target market the benefits and features of a product. ..Apple, for example, has invested in creating commercials for television, billboards, and magazines that showcase their products in such a way that their customers feel an affinity towards Apple's products.
Answer:
Monthly payment = $769.27
Explanation:
First we have to determine the future value of the ordinary annuity:
Payment = $235.15
N = 20 * 12 = 240
Rate = 3.2% / 12 = 0.267%
Using a financial calculator and the FV function, the FV = $78,910.41
Again, using the financial calculator or Excel, you can determine the monthly payment:
N = 10 / 12 = 120
Rate = 0.267%
PV = $78,910.41
FV = $0
Monthly payment = $769.27
The criteria for distinguishing between whether an expenditure is a capital item or a deductible expense is the useful life of the item.
If the purchase is going to be used and no longer have value at the end of the reporting period it is an expense for that period. If the item is a capital item it is going to have a longer useful life. In this case the item is depreciated over its useful life, assigning an expense amount to each accounting period that the item has value.
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
