Answer:
unethical
1. because everyone should be treated the same as the other.
2. because it is wrong to persuade the prosecutor even if they are friends or not.
3.if the client has done something wrong then he should be treated nicer he should be treated normally as everyone else even if the lawyer is friends with the prosecutor
Explanation:
The answer is your legal guardian and parent
Answer:
I say Arraignment because that is where they meet their client, then after the Arraignment, they talk to their client.
The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
A) Each party sees the national convention as a way to unify and strengthen its party
Hope this helped, good luck!
