Answer:
They were good rulers.
Explanation:
They were known as the good emperors because there wasn't a lot of conflict during their rule. Also the emperors after them were bad.
Answer:
C. Poor motor planning
Explanation:
Poor motor planning can be defined as the inability of a person to carryout tasks because the person brain cannot process sensory information including the neural connection in the brain of that person leading to POOR MOTOR PLANNING.
A person that has poor motor planning may be unable to write properly and form words.
Although Dyspraxia disorder can cause inability of a person to plan and effectively process motor tasks eventhough the person intelligent may not be affected but it mostly cause learning problem in children..
Therefore poor motor planning is the inability of a person to organize the body's actions which is why Raysor has difficulty in writing.
According to the scenario the type of problem Raysor shows is POOR MOTOR PLANNING
Answer:
Read Below
Explanation:
Question: The U.S Constitution required that the treaty be ratified by the U.S Senate under the Cherokee Constitution treaties had to be approved by the Cherokee national council. Did this occur with the treaty of 1835?
Answer: Negotiated in 1835 by a minority party of Cherokees, challenged by the majority of the Cherokee people and their elected government, the Treaty of New Echota was used by the United States to justify the forced removal of the Cherokees from their homelands along what became known as the Trail of Tears. In 1819 the remaining Cherokees who opposed removal negotiated still another treaty. So, yes it did occur in 1835.
Do you think U.S government has the right to enforce this treaty?
Another 130 years would pass before another president of the United States personally delivered a treaty to the Senate. On July 10, 1919, President Woodrow Wilson asked for a quick consent to the Treaty of Versailles. The Senate approved the treaty for ratification on October 20, 1803.
Hopes this Helps :D
Mark me as Brainiest Please : )
No, Krakuer does not cite any evidence regarding his analysis about alex relationship with his father.He believe that alex just got stuck in the middle of conflict between McCandless and the father. But, he is just basing the assumption on the relationship between McCandless and the father without knowing for sure how alex behave to the conflict.
