Answer:
Damages in tort
Explanation:
Damages are remedies that are monetary which are paid to a claimant to compensate for a loss or injury. To get the reward, the claimant must reveal that a foreseeable loss is caused by breach of duty. To be approved at law, the loss must be due to physical or mental injury or damage to property.
Damages are either classified as compensatory or punitive damages. Compensatory damages are also categorized into special damages and general damages. Special damages are property damage, loss of earnings and medical expenses, and general damages damages such as suffering and pain.
president abraham lincoln, reply to emancipation memorial presented by chicago christians of all denominations, 1862 the key concern that the excerpt was designed to address was the: Race and Equality
<h3>
What is Race and Equality?</h3>
Racial equality refers to a scenario in which individuals of all races and ethnicities are treated equally, regardless of any differences in physical characteristics. When organizations grant people their legal, moral, and political rights, racial equality results. Race equality is still becoming into the norm in modern Western culture.
Prior to the early 1960s, it was challenging for African, Asian, and Native Americans to achieve equality. Racial equality has since been codified into many other nations' laws, ensuring that all people have access to the same possibilities in terms of treatment, education, work, and other facets of life. From 1861 to 1865, the Civil War, the bloodiest and most painful conflict in American history, was waged. By 1860 one in three persons in the Southern States belonged to another.
to learn more about Race and Equality from the given link:
brainly.com/question/2680967
#SPJ4
Answer:
Today's world leaders must take Hitler as a <u>totally negative reference</u>, since taking advantage of the need of his people to introduce extremist ideas or hatred towards other countries is too cruel and wrong an act, on the other hand, it must imply that <u>any leader could abuse his power with adequate propaganda and circumstantial manipulation</u>, so it is the people who must be objective regarding political reality and distinguish which leader to follow and which not to follow.
Explanation:
<u>History must serve us to avoid making exactly the same mistakes of the past</u>, so a person who wants to lead a group of people properly, must be aware that in past years some leaders like Hitler have abused their power and that type of error, taking advantage of the trust or the ignorance of your people, should never be committed again.
I'm going to say judicial review. However since your question is a little unclear, I'm not sure this is the answer you want.
