Answer:
1. Going concern
2. Economic entity
3. Monetary unit
4. Periodicitys
Explanation:
1. Since Jumbo's Restaurant is planning to close, the assumption of continuity (going concern) is no more applicable. This should be disclosed. Instead asset was still recorded at historical price which is misleading.
2. Gorloks Tax Services is an economic entity, and the property and assets of owners are not considered to be for the business. In this case the boat Sam bought was wrongly reported as an asset of the company.
3. Claim Jumpers when reporting the 5 trucks purchased must include a monetary value for them. The assumption of monetary unit states that all items reported on the balance sheet must be expressed in monetary terms.
4. Cobbler's Etc violated the assumption of periodicity which states the financial position of the business must be declared in a particular accounting period. Accounting period can monthly, quarterly, biannually, and yearly. The business should choose and accounting period and ensure financial position is reported for each of them. In this case financial reporting is not consistent with reporting happening after 14 months and before that 18 months.
Answer:
c. a long-term liability.
Explanation:
Short term liabilities are those liabilities which need to be paid within one year time and Long term liabilities are those liabilities which need to be paid after one year time.
In this question on December 31, Howard Corporation need to pay the principal in 19 years from now, as it it a long period, so amount of principal will be classified as a long-term liability.
1) Banks hold excess and secondary reserves toA) reduce the interest-rate risk problem.
2) Which of the following statements most accurately describes the task of bank asset management?
b. Banks seek to have the highest liquidity possible subject to earning a positive rate of return on their operations.
3) The goals of bank asset management include
d. purchasing securities with high returns and low risk.
Hope this helps. Have a nice day.
Answer:
<em>Duress </em>
Explanation:
Duress is a protection against an agreement. Duress is <em>the wrong pressure to force an individual into an agreement that he or she would not normally enter into. </em>
Duress involves using force intentionally or threatening force to induce the agreement.
It may be either physical or mental manipulation, but it must be intimidation to the degree that it robs the other individual of independent will or freedom of choice.
This implies that no fair alternative to entering the contract is left to the individual.
