Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
A What is the probability that all 4 selected workers will be the day shift?
B What is the probability that all 4 selected workers will be the same shift?
C What is the probability that at least two different shifts will be represented among the selected workers.
A)
The total number of workers = 10 + 8 + 6 = 24
The probability that all 4 selected workers will be the day shift is given as:
B) The probability that all 4 selected workers will be the same shift (
) = probability that all 4 selected workers will be the day shift + probability that all 4 selected workers will be the swing shift + probability that all 4 selected workers will be the graveyard shift.
Hence:
C) The probability that at least two different shifts will be represented among the selected workers (
)= 1 - the probability that all 4 selected workers will be the same shift()
Answer: The correct answer is "the informal rules of the game".
Explanation: The given scenario illustrates <u>the informal rules of the game.</u>
<u>Because despite not being an official standard, it is an informal rule that the company tends to follow because it gives good results, and is backed by the organizational culture of the company.</u>
Answer:
The correct option is d.
Explanation:
It is given that $15,000 is considered to be material to the income statement, but $25,000 is material to the balance sheet.
Material to the income statement = $15,000
Material to the balance sheet = $25000
The auditor should set overall materiality according to the income statement.
The auditor should set overall materiality at $15,000.
Therefore the correct option is d.
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
