Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
match the vocabulary word to its correct definition
1 additive identity
—the number 0 (for the numbers)
2 equation
—a mathematical sentence whose verb is ‘equal’ (=)
3 multiplicative identity
—the number 1 (for the real numbers
4 open sentence
—an equation that contains a variable or variables
5 symmetric property
—when the sides of an equation are interchanged, an equivalent equation is formed ; if a=b, then b=a
Hi there.
Thanks for using Brainly!
First, let's rewrite to make this problem easier.
1^2 - a^2b^2
Then we must multiply the terms with equal exponents with their bases.
1^2-(ab)^2
Using the factor: a^2 - b^2=(a-b)(a+b)
We can factor using that expression.
(1-ab) x (1+ab)
After factoring, this has been our solution.
Solution: (1-ab) x (1+ab)
Thanks for using Brainly!
- Tutor John
Answer:
2.33 x 3.26 = 6
32.13 x 2.26=64
523.1 x 9.71=5,230
2561/20.36=128.5
7.6 x 3.89=32
38.89 x 52.25=2028
1826/19.51=91.3
201.21 x 65.63=13,266
Step-by-step explanation: Again, going by what you said, 2.33 would round to 2. So, on the paper attached, I rounded all the numbers to the nearest whole number and then I multipled them. To clarify, if the answers need to be rounded to the nearest whole number as well, then 91.3 would be 91 instead and 128.5 would be 129 instead
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
90/3=30
Answer:
d. Ad hominem
Step-by-step explanation:
A fallacy can be defined as a mistaken or false belief that are based on illogical arguments or reasoning.
However, a lot of people might actually think it to be true but it isn't. There are various types of fallacy, these include;
I. Black or white.
II. Non sequitur.
III. Appeal to moderation.
IV. Bandwagon.
V. Appeal to authority.
VI. Straw man.
VII. Oversimplification or hasty generalization.
VIII. Appeal to ignorance.
IX. Appeal to pity.
X. Ad hominem.
Ad hominem can be defined as a type of fallacy in which the motive, character, or some other aspect of a person is attacked rather than his or her position.
This ultimately implies that, Ad hominem is typically based on prejudices, emotions, or feelings rather than appealing to reason, intellect or substance.
In this scenario, John Bardeen's research work at the Advanced Institute for Physics has progressed so slowly that even his colleagues call him a plodder. As a result, the speaker concluded that it's prudent at present not to take seriously his current theory on how strings constitute the smallest of subatomic particles. Thus, the logical fallacy described above is an ad hominem because John's slowness in his research work is bone of contention for the speaker rather than analyzing and concentrating on his theory about strings.
