Answer:
The Creeks gave up land in exchange for money and protection, but the US government did little to stop settlers from pushing west.
Explanation:
The fight for land and belonging has been a constant source of discontentment between the Native Indians and the American government. The Creeks were one such native people who, like every other Native Indian, had to suffer at the hands of the United States government and try to find peaceful ways for them to have their own reservations.
But while there are numerous wars fought between the two, there are also numerous treaties signed to try to maintain peace and cordial relations. The <u>Treaty of New York (1790), the Treaty of Fort Jackson (1814), and the Treaty of Indian Springs (1825)</u> were some of the treaties signed between the two parties. And<u> one common factor of these treaties is that the Creeks were made to cede their lands in exchange for some money and protection from the government</u>. But while the Native Indians kept their part of the agreement, the<u> U. S. Government did not do much to keep their part and did not stop the flow of settlers</u> in the areas of the Native Indians.
<span>Anti-federalists were concerned about the new constitution because of the following reasons:
</span>1. They felt that the Constitution gave too much power to the national government at the expense of the state governments.
2. According to the anti-federalists, even within the national government, the legislative and executive branches were too powerful. Therefore, t<span>hey worried that public officials would scheme to increase their power.
3. T</span>hey believed that legislators should be insulated from political pressure.
4. They saw that smaller republics were prone to political corruption.
5. <span> They were concerned that the Constitution lacked a specific listing of rights.</span>
Professionally trained army, iron weapons, advanced engineering skills, effective tactics, and, most importantly, a complete ruthlessness which came to characterize the Assyrians to their neighbors and subjects and still attaches itself to the reputation of Assyria in the Modern.
