Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "8%".
Explanation:
The given values are:
Number of years of maturity = 5 years
Interest rate of coupon = 10%
= 10%×1000
= 100
Yield to maturity, YTM = 8%
As we know,
Price of Bond = PV of Coupons + PV of Per Value
On putting the values in the above formula, we get
⇒ = 
⇒ = 
After 1 years, we get
Price of Bond = PV of Coupons + PV of Per Value
On putting the values in the above formula, we get
⇒ = 
⇒ = 
Now,
The total return rate = 
= 
= 
Answer:
David Snow focused on this set of conguent interests on social movements issues strategies on his most important scholarly achievement which he called "framing perspective"
Explanation:
Snow´s "framing perspective" approach on large, informal groupings of individuals or organizations to negotiate on emergent meanings of social-movement issues, is psychological and centered in agencies services focused on specific action for change.
More than competing perspectives framing perspective is a diagnostic framing to identify the problem to assign of blame; prognostic framing to suggest solutions, strategies, and tactics to a problem and motivational framing to get rationale action to the types of social change, which could be alternative, redemptive, reformative and revolutionary according to David F. Aberle a cultural anthropologist.
Answer:
1.Cost of Goods Sold Increase by $70,000
2.Gross Profit and Net Profit decrease by $70,000
3.Inventory in balance sheet decrease by $70,000
Explanation:
IAS 2 requires inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
In our case the inventory will be valued at net realizable value of $230,000 because this is lower.
The effect with this is :
1.Cost of Goods Sold Increase by $70,000
2.Gross Profit and Net Profit decrease by $70,000
3.Inventory in balance sheet decrease by $70,000
