Answer:
C
Explanation:
because I feel that many individuals would select the most basic option, such as A or B.
Answer:
d. there is a technological improvement.
Explanation:
a) replacing production of one good in favor of another will be a move across the PPF
b) abandon inefficient production will bring the production to the PPF from a place below it.
c) has no relationship it will simply put inflationary pressure.
<em>d) the technological improvement will make a better use of the factor thus, increasing productivity and making possible more production with the same amount of materials.</em>
Answer:
75%
Explanation:
Since the production center is available for 8 hours per day in a factory, and the worker operating it is required to lubricate these rotary parts once each day.
If it takes 2 hours to remove these parts from the equipment, lubricate them, and re-assemble them and the production center is not available for production during these times;
Then the availability of the production center is 75% which is derived by : [8 hours total - 2 hours downtime / 8 hours total availability] x 100 = 75%
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
a)
In IFRS according to IAS 19 all past service cost is recognized in the net income in the period in which amendment (change) is made by entity for defined benefit pension, it does not matter what is the status of the employees who will benefit the change. So in Year 1 $150000 will be expended completely and in subsequent years the amount is $0
Year 1 =$150000
Subsequent years= $0
b) In US GAAP the past service cost is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the year of amendment. It is amortized over the future working life of the participants.
Year 1 is year of adoption hence $0 is amortized because $150000 is included in Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Subsequent years: (150000/10=15000) $15000 will be amortized for each year for 10 years.
The Answer Is Option A, Action
