<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases
A type of insurance that protects workers from loss wages after an industrial accident that happened on the job is called worker compensation.
- Workers' compensation insurance offers financial aid and/or medical attention to employees who are hurt on the job or fall ill as a direct result of their work. This insurance is paid for by the employer; the employee is not expected to contribute to the cost of compensation.
- Workers' compensation, sometimes known as workers' comp, is a type of insurance that offers pay replacement and medical benefits to employees hurt while doing their jobs in return for a requirement that they waive their right to sue their employer for carelessness. The compensation bargain is the trade-off between restricted, guaranteed coverage and no other options outside of the worker compensation system.
Thus this is the answer.
To learn more about worker compensation, refer: brainly.com/question/27993713
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is "No Effect
".
Explanation:
In the situation wherein the write-off would not affect the 2019 net earnings, the write-off reduces that both debt accounts as well as the benefit counter-asset for similar quantities. Whenever an expenditure was recognized, net revenues were affected, therefore, there will be nothing to write off under the allowance approach, so the response is no effect.
Answer: The number of shares outstanding is approximately 170702.32 shares.
We have :
EPS $0.43
Net Income $73,402
The formula for computing EPS is
Substituting the values from the question in the formula above we get,
Answer:
Explanation:
a)
The YTM of the bond at par value is equals to its coupon rate, 8.75%. Other things being equal, this 4% coupon rate bond will be more eye-catching as the coupon rate is lower than the current market yields, and its price is far below the call price. So, if yields drop, capital gains on the bond will not be restricted by the call price.
b)
If an investor foresees that yields will fall considerably, the 4% bond proposes a better expected return.
c)
Implicit call protection is offered in the sense that any likely fall in yields would not be nearly enough to make the firm consider calling the bond. In this sense, the call feature is almost irrelevant
