Answer:
a. Overhead cost per blender = $28.27
Explanation:
Overhead rate = $149,315 / 3,945
Overhead rate = $37.85
Overhead cost per blender = (Blender Direct labor hours * Overhead rate) / Units of blunder Produced and sold
Overhead cost per blender = (1,195 * $37.85) / 1,600
Overhead cost per blender = $45,230.75 / 1,600
Overhead cost per blender = $28.27
Answer:
D. All of the choices could occur when using a single discount rate for all projects.
Explanation:
- The discount rate is the rate of return that is used to discount the cash flows analysis in determining the present and future values of cash flows.
- The discount rate also called the discounted cash flow analysis follows the valuation method based on the time concept of money the DFC helps to find out the variability of the project by calculating the present values by the discounted rate.
- <u>Thus if all the projects are assigned the same discount rates then the aim of revaluation of the project choices will be the same for all the projects like investing in standards assets like the bonds. </u>
The answer is beneficial. A small research displays that allowing a fever run its course may decrease the span and relentlessness of such sicknesses like colds and flu. As for the worry among parents that fevers can have damaging effects, these occurrences are very occasional. The brain has an interior controlling mechanism that stops fevers caused by contaminants from receiving higher than 105 or 106 degrees.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
