Answer:
My solution to this problem is subjective. The difference between Robert and Magnus's levels of concepts is MOST likely attributed to<em> Algorithms & Heuristics</em>
<em></em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
It is subjective in the sense that an <em>Algorithm </em>is a defined set of rules and/or steps used to solve specific problems. ... While Algorithms will come up with solid answers (and usually the same answer each time).
<em>Heuristics</em> will allow the user's experience to inform decisions that might take more time but it certain to work through.
In one hand, the difference between Robert and Magnus's levels of concepts is MOST likely attributed to the fact that Robert had played college football and is now a high school football coach. Robert has basic concepts of special terms to include the punt return, extra point unit, and kick-off return will be applying the <em>heuristic method </em>in American football which needs prompt and quick decisions to contain the incursions of your opponents.
On the other hand, Magnus, an immigrant from Denmark, who learns the game of American football and has basic concepts of offence and defence will be inclined to use the <em>algorithm methodology</em> to approach his basic skills which not very good in games. This is because algorithmic patterns take time to plan and execute which may be counter-productive given the dynamism of the human reflexes need to attend to actions of opponents in a football game.
Answer: link the names to the information he knows at hand about the people by encoding using long term memory process.
Explanation: the memory process is the way we get, keep and retrieve (take) informations. The memory helps us to save things(information) that we can use later on. The way information goes into our memory is the encoding process. Using the long time memory approach will help you remember the names of the president. Most people have different way they encode. I believe the way we grab or take informations respectively matters. The more you analyse an information by processing it, the more you remember about that information. I believe engaging the semantics method which involves deep processing of information is the right way. My having the history or informations about the various president in your head by reading and researching, you can easily link the presidents to their acheivement. This will aid in you, recurring the names of the president. The visual method also help where pictures with names are linked to the various acheivement of the president.
Answer:
Compromises
Explanation:
When different parties are working together in a legislative branches, they tend to be working against one another since each party tends to have a different idea regarding the proper way to manage the economy.
(For example, the Republicans tend to want to lower taxes for business to flourish, the democrats tend to want higher taxes for increasing government budget in welfare, etc)
Because of this, they often have to compromise with one another during the legislative process. Sometimes, one party will let another party win when Creating certain legislation and that other party will return the favor when they are discussing another type of legislation.
Answer:
Activity theory
Explanation:
Activity theory is a framework of original theory rather than a predictive theory. In this theory, there are hierarchical levels for the motivation of human beings. People are linked with their cultural context through social interactions.
This theory has five basic principles.
The human activities are directed towards the objects.
The human activities are inscribed by the social knowledge
Human activities are evolved.
In the activity theory, aging people still motivated at their near death bed. After retirement, they even involved inactivity or any kind of job. This is a good example of activity theory.
Answer:
Explanation:
The textbook describes a study in which one group of participants was asked to determine whether working out a day before a tennis match made the player more likely to win, and another group of participants was asked to determine whether working out a day before a tennis match made a player more likely to lose. Consistent with the confirmation bias, participants in the group examining a connection between working out and winning were most likely to search for information about how many players worked out and then won their matches.