1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
3 years ago
8

Jessica Grayson is a secretary at Washington High School. She is in charge of ordering janitorial supplies from Joe's Cleaning C

enter. Jessica is also authorized to write and sign the checks for these supplies. Jessica is friends with Jake Emerson, who works at Joe's. Once a month, Jessica writes an order for $300 worth of supplies that the school really doesn't need. Jake signs the business manager's name from Joe's on the checks and gives them back to Jessica. She cashes the checks and deposits them into her own savings account. Jake makes sure the supplies are never delivered to the school. Are Jessica and Jake both committing a crime? If so, what crime(s)?
Law
1 answer:
r-ruslan [8.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement

Jake = Forgery

Both = Conspiracy

Explanation:

• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.

Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.

• Jake's crime is forgery

Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.

• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.

A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.

You might be interested in
Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can the evidence seen when initially entering the house be used in court as evidence of his guilt?
zubka84 [21]

Yes, The evidence discovered upon first entering the house may be utilized in court to prove his guilt.

<h3>Which or which kind of evidence are not allowed in court?</h3>

Anything that violates the law or the rules of the court is not admissible evidence. For instance, hearsay evidence or evidence collected illegally is not admissible. Additionally, it might not be accepted if information is not directly related to the dispute. Evidence that is detrimental may also render it inadmissible in court.

<h3>What two conditions must be met before a piece of evidence can be used in court?</h3>

Criminal cases (a) (1) The defendant may demonstrate that the moral quality at issue in the alleged conduct is consistent with his or her decent moral character. (2) The prosecution may not establish the defendant's bad moral character as it relates to the moral characteristic at issue in the alleged offense, unless in rebuttal.

To know more about admissible evidence, visit:

brainly.com/question/29550883

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Which of the following statement is true? a) Consideration need not be any particular value. b) Consideration should accord the
Lera25 [3.4K]
The correct answer should be D.
3 0
2 years ago
The u. S. Constitution resolved one weakness of the articles of confederation- group of answer choices
skad [1K]

The US constitution resolved one weakness of the articles of confederation that was the lack of the power of the central government in the tax regulation and regulation of commerce.

What is the article of confederation?

Article of confederation was the First constitution of US which was made by the congress in order to have the national government in November 1777. This article was enacted in 1781.

Article of confederation involved with the one weakness that the central government was lacking in the power for the regulation of tax and commerce.

In order to resolve that issue they gave the second draft in which they gave freedom to all other states thus it protected their rights and gave them autonomy.

Learn more about constitution here:

brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
Plaintiff definition
adell [148]

Answer:

a person who brings a case against another in a court of law.

"the plaintiff commenced an action for damages"

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. Any pursuit driving should be done with the aim of minimizing the risk to:
    7·2 answers
  • Do you like bnha????????????????????
    12·2 answers
  • Heyy, Howzit going??
    13·2 answers
  • By criticizing the party that is in power, the party that is out of power serves a
    5·1 answer
  • Pleaseee drop xbox gamertags for an inv to a party rn !!
    14·2 answers
  • Descripe two ways in which the law protect citizens against xenophobia​
    7·1 answer
  • Who can obtain a search warrant for a crime scene?
    10·1 answer
  • This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
    9·1 answer
  • List the chief justices of liberia​
    7·1 answer
  • the sum of the ages of farhan and his cousin is 38. Seven years ago, Farhan was thrice as old as his cousin. Find farhan’s prese
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!