You should always remember to keep your eyes _________

Fill in the blank: ____________ elect one state senator and two representatives to serve in the Arizona State Senate and Arizona

jeyben [28]

Answer:

d. legislative districts

Explanation:

State legislative districts are areas from which members are being elected into the state legislatures. State legislative districts consists of the upper (senate—SLDU) and lower (house—SLDL) chambers.

The Arizona State Legislature consists of 30 legislative districts, with each legislative district electing one senator and two representatives who are to serve a two year term.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Challenges of separation of power

Scrat [10]

In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.

6 0

3 years ago

on the blank spaces, analyze the concentric circles and write a short interpretation based on your understanding

Step2247 [10]

Answer:

Concentric circles are circles with a common center. The region between two concentric circles of different radii is called an annulus. Any two circles can be made concentric by inversion by picking the inversion center as one of the limiting points.

1. Picking any two points on the outer circle and connecting them gives 1/3.

2. Picking any random point on a diagonal and then picking the chord that perpendicularly bisects it gives 1/2.

3. Picking any point on the large circle, drawing a line to the center, and then drawing the perpendicularly bisected chord gives 1/4.

So some care is obviously needed in specifying what is meant by "random" in this problem.

Given an arbitrary chord BB^' to the larger of two concentric circles centered on O, the distance between inner and outer intersections is equal on both sides (AB=A^'B^'). To prove this, take the perpendicular to BB^' passing through O and crossing at P. By symmetry, it must be true that PA and PA^' are equal. Similarly, PB and PB^' must be equal. Therefore, PB-PA=AB equals PB^'-PA^'=A^'B^'. Incidentally, this is also true for homeoids, but the proof is nontrivial.

8 0

3 years ago

3. All pedestrians understand the distance required for a motor vehicle to stop.

Ipatiy [6.2K]

True..........................

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Rio Business Corporation pays potential clients, including private foreign companies and the representatives of foreign labor or

AVprozaik [17]

<u>Corporation R makes payments to potential clients, including representatives of foreign labor organizations and private foreign companies to facilitate business. If the company knows that the payments will be passed on to a foreign government, then this practice is illegal if the payments violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. </u>

Further Explanation:

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: It is enacted for making payment unlawful that is made by certain classes of entities and persons to foreign government officials to facilitate business.

Justification for correct and incorrect answer:

a.

Illegal if the payments violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: This option is correct.

The FCPA states any payment made to the foreign government to assists in retaining and obtaining business is unlawful under the law. So, if the payment violates the conditions that are laid down in the Act, then it is illegal.

b.

Legal because the third party acts as “go-between’’: This option is incorrect.

According to the law, if the payment is made indirectly or through the agent but violates the conditions that are laid down in the Act, then the payment is still considered.

c.

Legal because the private parties are involved on both sides of the deal: This option is incorrect.

The involvement of the private parties on both sides of the deal does not make the payment legal to a foreign government if it is made to facilitate the business.

d.

Legal because the payments are made to facilitate the business: This option is incorrect.

The payment made to a foreign government for obtaining or retaining the business in the country is illegal under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Learn more:

1. Legal liability of the business

brainly.com/question/5742225

2. The percentage of sales method

brainly.com/question/12960656

3. The sales budget

brainly.com/question/12985585

Answer details:

Grade: Middle School

Subject: Business Studies

Chapter: Business law

Keywords: Rio Corporation makes payments to potential clients, including representatives of foreign labor organizations and private foreign companies to facilitate business. If the company knows that the payments will be passed on to a foreign government, this practice, illegal if the payments violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, legal because the third party acts as “go-between’’, legal because the private parties are involved on both sides of the deal, legal because the payments are made to facilitate the business.

7 0

4 years ago

You should always remember to keep your eyes __________ while you are driving