The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
The Catholic Church has long taken the question of slavery seriously. Slavery has been practiced and approved of by numerous cultures and faiths worldwide throughout the majority of human history.
<h3>Who and why did slavery begin?</h3>
In order to help with the cultivation of products like tobacco, African slaves were first brought to Jamestown, Virginia, in North America in 1619. They left towards the north in late 1848 because it is where slaves are freed and where slavery doesn't exist.
<h3>The US Constitution: Does it permit slavery?</h3>
Yes, according to the 13th Amendment, slavery is still a legal punishment for crimes for which a person has been found guilty in a court of law.
To learn more about Slavery here:
brainly.com/question/1910034
#SPJ4
