Answer: c. The new system contained assumptions that did not consider critical factors such as changes in time zones, travel time across hemispheres, and pilot flying hours
Explanation:
Upon review of the effectiveness of a strategic business decision using evidence-based analytics, business leaders may reverse course.
The factor that led to the reversal of the new scheduling system is that the new system contained assumptions that did not consider critical factors such as changes in time zones, travel time across hemispheres, and pilot flying hours.
Explanation:
a. What were some good and/or poor examples of communication?
Intercultural communication in the workplace can generate some significant difficulties, in an intercultural work team, there may be behaviors of certain members that differ from the rest of the group, which can mean lack of integration of the team due to lack of respect and interest to the cultural values of a particular member.
b. Discuss any examples or interpretation of cultural differences as described in Hoftstede's Cultural Values chart on p. 46 of your text (i.e. individualism, time orientation, formality, etc.).
Formality can be interpreted differently according to different cultures. In a more flexible culture like the American one, for example, formality may not be so expressed through the use of formal language and dress, whereas in a less flexible culture, this can be seen as a disrespect, as they can establish a more serious and formal communication in the workplace.
c. Is there anything that could have been done to make the communication more effective?
To make intercultural communication more effective, it is necessary above all to respect the individual values of an individual that exist in certain ways in some situations. The ideal is that people are open to learn and exchange experiences, willing to help the individual to integrate into the group, and above all to act in an ethical and respectful way always.
<span>Year Cash Flow
0 -$46,400
1 18,000
2 33,530
3 4,600</span>
<span>NPV = -$46,400 + $18,000 / (1 + 0.09) + $33,530 / (1 + 0.09)2 + $4,600 / (1 + 0.09)3 =
</span><span>-$1,574.41</span>
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>NICK</u> to choose <u>RIGHT</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Nick chooses <u>RIGHT</u> and Rosa chooses <u>RIGHT</u>.
Explanation:
ROSA
left right
4 / 6 /
left 3 4
NICK
right 6 / 7 /
7 6
Rosa does not have a dominant strategy since both expected payoffs are equal:
- if she chooses left, her expected payoff = 3 + 7 = 10
- if she chooses right, her expected payoff = 4 + 6 = 10
Nick has a dominant strategy, if he chooses right, his expected payoff will be higher:
- if he chooses left, his expected payoff = 4 +6 = 10
- if he chooses right, his expected payoff = 6 + 7 = 13
The only possible Nash equilibrium exists if both Rosa and Nick choose right, so that their strategies are the same, resulting in Rosa earning 6 and Nick 7.
Hello there,
A typical cost of a retirement would be the following:
Perhaps the "Car of the year".
Smaller House/Smaller apartment.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen