2+½, is just 2½, now divided by 1/4.
let's first convert the mixed fraction to improper, and then divide.
![\bf \stackrel{mixed}{2\frac{1}{2}}\implies \cfrac{2\cdot 2+1}{2}\implies \stackrel{improper}{\cfrac{5}{2}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \cfrac{5}{2}\div \cfrac{1}{4}\implies \cfrac{5}{2}\cdot \cfrac{4}{1}\implies \cfrac{5}{1}\cdot \cfrac{4}{2}\implies 5\cdot 2\implies 10](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cstackrel%7Bmixed%7D%7B2%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%5Ccdot%202%2B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cstackrel%7Bimproper%7D%7B%5Ccfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%0A~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%5Cdiv%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B4%7D%7B1%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B5%7D%7B1%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B4%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%205%5Ccdot%202%5Cimplies%2010)
Correct Question:
Otero translated the phrase "three less than a number" into the expression 3 minus x. Which best describes the accuracy of Otero's expression?.
a. It is accurate. The phrase can be translated as "three" = 3, "less than" = subtraction, and "a number" = X, SO 3- X is
the correct expression.
b. It is inaccurate. Three is being subtracted from a number, so X-3 is what he should have written.
c. It is inaccurate. Three is being compared to a number, so 3 It is inaccurate. Three is being added to a number, so 3+ x is what he should have written.
Answer:
The answer is B because three less than a number means that a 3 is less than some number X meaning three is being subtracted from X. So equation should be X-3 rather than 3-X.
Step-by-step explanation: