Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
How much would $100, growing at 5% per year, be worth after 75 years?
We need to use the following formula to calculate the final value.
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 100*(1+0.05)^75
FV= $3,883.27
Answer:
$1,800,000
Explanation:
The veteran player makes $1.6 million per year.
The new prayer will be paid $1 million per year.
the Savings per year will be
= $1, 600,000 - 1,000,000
= $ 600,000
The savings in three years will be
=$600,000 x 3
=$1,800,000
Answer:
C. The equilibrium interest rate will rise.
Explanation:
According to the question, When the economy made the transition from the short run equilibrium to the long run equilibrium than there is a rise in the supply that results in rise in the nominal wages but the real wage would remain unchanged or constant
Therefore the option c is correct and the rest of the options are wrong
Answer:
4. Your house - MONEY IS THE MOST LIQUID ASSET THAT CAN EXIST
2. The funds in a savings account - MOST SAVINGS ACCOUNTS ALLOW THEIR CLIENTS A CERTAIN NUMBER OF WITHDRAWALS OR ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS PER MONTH, SO MONEY AT A SAVINGS ACCOUNT IS ALSO VERY LIQUID.
1. A bond issued by a publicly traded company - THE COMPLETE PROCESS OF SELLING A BOND MAY TAKE FROM ONE FULL DAY TO A FEW DAYS, SINCE FIRST YOUR TRADER MUST SELL THE BOND AND THEN THEY MUST TRANSFER THE MONEY TO YOUR ACCOUNT. STILL BONDS ARE LIQUID ASSETS.
4. Your house - SELLING A HOUSE IS A LONG PROCESS THAT CAN TAKE A FEW DAYS (AT BEST) TO SEVERAL MONTHS, SO A HOUSE IS NOT A VERY LIQUID ASSET.
Answer:
Correct Answer is Option c
It is efficient to build the fence.
(The net profit is 100 to each for an entire of 200 and the cost is 150, consequently it is efficient. For example both contribute 75, and their evaluation is 100 so both are better off with the barrier built)
a) and b) are incorrect as disbursing more than the own evaluation is not a firmly conquered strategy and each player giving 100 will be corresponding to a total of 200 and it is not a Nash equilibrium as both can reduction what they pay and be better off.
d) There are Nash equilibria in which the fence is not built. (Assume one is paying 0, then the cost to be reserved up by the other one will be 150 and the evaluation is 100, so both paying 0 will be a Nash equilibria as neither have any inducement to deviate and pay alone).
