Answer: According to Piaget, Dino demonstrated EGOCENTRISM when he did not turn the book to where his Mom could see.
Explanation:
Egocentrism
Children at their youngest age are more centered on themselves as individuals not concerned with everyone outside of that due to the fact that they haven't established the rules of society so their thoughts and communication still evolve around them. When a child is not able to see things in someone else's perspective but sees things only in their own perspective Piaget refers to this as egocentrism.
Piaget suggests that a child believes everyone sees, feel and hear things just like they do.
At this stage that when they would start to play next to others but not with them and even when they speak they don't speak with an intention to make a conversation.
At this stage Dino believes his mom will see the book the way he sees it hence he doesn't turn it to her.
Answer:
intuition
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the MBTI dimension that is being described is intuition. This refers to an individual which is intuitive, future-oriented, and imaginative among other things. Which is what Karl is being described as since he is imaginitive and trusts his hunches (intuitive).
Answer:
Explanation:
The work in the south was farming. To maintains these big farms you needed a lot of people to do the work. Since hiring people costs a lot of money they usually bought slaves to do the work for them because it was cost proficient. The north focused more on industry working and factories so people had a lot of jobs and there wasn't really a big need for slaves. That's why when the north wanted to abolish slavery the south didn't agree because most of their farms were maintained by slaves. Thus the Civil War happened.
I believe the answer is: <span>they directly implement and enforce new laws that establish policy
The creation of new implemented laws and policy are most influenced by high ranking legislative officials who are eligible to give their votes
The executive departments had the full right to make necessary steps that could put those new laws and policies into realization.</span>
Answer: the correct answer is (c) a fallacious argument masquerading as valid.
Explanation:
Fallacious Argument.- An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid. It is crucial to remember that reasoning from definitions and facts to conclusions is fundamentally different from reasoning about definitions.
