Answer:
<em>False.</em> It is an inductive, weak argument.
Explanation:
The given statement is not deductive and valid, <em>because it derives its conclusion only from limited evidence</em> that U.N. is presented in a negative light in this isolated statement.
<u>The other example</u>, is a survey of students meal choice preferences in the campus canteen. Only because 75% of students in a sample group of 100 said that they do not support availability meat-based meals in the canteen, does not mean that 75% of all students do not support availability meat-based meals as well.
Answer:
b. operational definition
Explanation:
Operational definition is the expression of procedure used to define the nature of an event or situation especially used during data collection. In this question, the sentence subject used is 'the intensity of the electrical shock the students are to receive'. Which mean it is asking specifically on the subject of the intensity of the electrical shock.
Option A, hypothetical construct is not it since hypothetical construct is a variable which could be explained but hardly observed. In this case, hypothetical construct is more suitable to the degree of pain (extremely painful, mild shock and other)
Option C, mediating definition is the mediator variable between a dependent and an independent variables; in this case is not applicable
While Option D, conceptual definition give the definition of a certain concept. For example the definition of concept of pain.
Therefore the best answer for this is B, operational definition since it focus on how to measure the intensity of the electrical shock
I would say it's very powerful not sure
The answer is debriefing. In Psychology, this is the process that is showed in psychological research with human subjects subsequently an experiment or study has been determined. This meaning is just the same with the APA Ethics, in here participants must be told of the determination of the study and offered with means to contact the researchers about the outcomes.