Answer:
Proactive interference.
Explanation:
What the exercise is exemplifying about is "Proactive interference" which is, as it's name indicates, an interference of our memory. When we are looking for a particular word, moment, etc., using our memory, sometimes we find a newer memory that intereferes, that confuses us for a moment. This is what is called proactive interference, and a very good example of that is what occurs to Deanna: she studied Spanish in high school and now, probably years later, she studies French. But, when attempting to do so, she confuses some words with Spanish words.
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
Answer:
Masculinity
Explanation: masculinity is an attribute of men. It can also be term manliness.it a term use for general behavior of men or boys. Masculinity is associated with men and there are positive and negative masculinity. A man is manly if he make right and good decisions, bold, articulate, not given to wine, hardworking and ambitious. When a man is not showing this characteristics, is identity and image becomes tanished and this leads to abuse and disrespect. When a man is not playing his role or duties example no of good character,or not showing good example, they are using told to man up to his responsibility and not disgrace his manhood.
Answer: b and d
Explanation:
A isn’t correct because Ross was a Cherokee chief C obviously isn’t right and e is incorrect because McIntosh was motivated by land not gold
