Answer:
The correct answer is sentence D)
Explanation:
the last sentence portrays an audience who had yet to visit Dharavi and who had a wrong idea about how it looked and what it was like.
The sentence reads "<u>I could see</u> that they all thought Dharavi was spectacular to look at..."
So it's safe to say that amongst the other sentences, the first three words "I could see" can be interpreted to mean that the tour guide just realised there was an opportunity.
Cheers.
The statement that best explains why the Supreme Court ruled in the students favor is A; The events involved symbolic speech without disruption. The Tinker v. Des Moines involved the suspension of three teenagers that wore armbands to school in support of protesting against the Vietnam War. The court ruling was that the students' free speech right was violated by the school district.
The american one stayed mainly between the U.S. and Great Britian, until the French joined. The french one was happening between the lower class french and the french government then i evoled like a pokemon into the french fighting athor monarchies in europe like austria and purssia. i really hope this helps you.
Answer:
The answer is Narmer. He was the first king to unify the country pacefully as well. My guess as to why we don't know too much about these kingdoms is because there just isn't too much information available from the time about these kingdoms. There are a lack of primary sources.
Explanation:
Narmer was the first king of Egypt to unify the country peacefully (beginning of the 1st dynastic period).
