This is the inverse of f(x)= -3 - (-2)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f7d6/8f7d6f5f6fba3139bf340ffe8f2e8dd1cb132a23" alt="\bf \begin{array}{ccccllll} &distance&rate(km/hr)&time(hrs)\\ &\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash&\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash&\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\\ A&d&60&t\\ B&600-d&v&t+3 \end{array}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff6b3/ff6b31859f54e446b48e4ac0efd5232e32cf9806" alt="\bf \textit{meaning}\implies \begin{cases} d=(60)(t) \\ \quad \\ 600-d=(v)(t+3)\\ ------------\\ d=\boxed{60t}\qquad thus \\ \quad \\ 600-\boxed{60t}=v(t+3)\leftarrow \textit{solve for "t"} \end{cases}"
keep in mind, that "t" is the time when the train at A station, left towards B station
they met, at some time "t", and by the time that happened, train from A
which started 3 hours earlier, had already covered "d" distance,
whatever that is
and the train coming from B, covered, 600-d, or the difference
55 is 55% of 100.
percents are based of of 100, so 55 would be 55/100 or 55%.
To resolve the proposed issue, an explanation is needed in which the subject is addressed
The dominant term is -2x⁴.
As X approaches infinite, y is naturally going to be really large as well.
Remember that a number with an even exponent, regardless of whether it's positive or negative, will be positive.
As x approaches infinite, y will approach -2 * ∞, or -∞. Therefore, the end behavior in the positive direction is y=-∞
As x approaches negative infinite, y will approach -2 *∞ again. This is because -∞⁴ = ∞. Therefore, the end behavior in the negative direction is also y=-∞
Basically, due to the dominance of the -2x^4 term, the function will look more or less like a downward facing parabola with a y-intercept of 3.