When we approach limits, we are finding values that are infinitesimally approaching this x-value. Essentially, we consider the approximate location that this root or limit appears. This is essential when it comes to taking Calculus, and finding the limit or rate of change of a function.
When we are attempting limits questions, there are several tests we attempt first.
1. Evaluate the limit by substituting the value of the x-value as it approaches the value (direct evaluation of a limit)
2. Rearrangement of the function, such that we can evaluate the limit.
3. (TRIGONOMETRIC PROPERTIES)


4. Using L'Hopital's Rule for indeterminate limits, such as 0/0, -infinity/infinity, or infinity/infinity.
For example:
1)

We can do this using the first and second method.
<em>Method 1: Direct evaluation:</em>Substitute x = 0 to the function.


<em>Method 2: Rearranging the function
</em>We can see that x - 25 can be rewritten as: (√x - 5)(√x + 5)
By rewriting it in this form, the top will cancel with the bottom easily, and our limit comes out the same.



Every example works exactly the same way, and by remembering these criteria, every limit question should come out pretty naturally.
Hello! So, in order to solve this question, we should do 500/4. 500/4 = 125. Multiply 125 by 3 and you get 375. The horse costs $125 and the carriage costs $375.
Answer: 0.1353
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : The mean of failures = 0.025 per hour.
Then for 8 hours , the mean of failures =
per eight hours.
Let X be the number of failures.
The formula to calculate the Poisson distribution is given by :_

Now, the probability that the instrument does not fail in an 8-hour shift :-

Hence, the the probability that the instrument does not fail in an 8-hour shift = 0.1353
Answer:a
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
0.0838 (8.62%)
Step-by-step explanation:
defining the event G= an out-of-state transaction took place in a gasoline station , then the probability is
P(G) = probability that the transaction is fraudulent * probability that took place in a gasoline station given that is fraudulent + probability that the transaction is not fraudulent * probability that took place in a gasoline station given that is not fraudulent = 0.033 * 0.092 + 0.977 * 0.034 = 0.0362
then we use the theorem of Bayes for conditional probability. Defining also the event F= the transaction is fraudulent , then
P(F/G)=P(F∩G)/P(G) = 0.033 * 0.092 /0.0362 = 0.0838 (8.62%)
where
P(F∩G)= probability that the transaction is fraudulent and took place in a gasoline station
P(F/G)= probability that the transaction is fraudulent given that it took place in a gasoline station