2) Either regulatory or antitrust. I haven't taken econ (except for Academic Decathlon Econ), so I might be wrong on this one.
3) <span>Blake Mycoskie
</span>4) Joseph Unahue because all the others invented their own products.
5) Demand for avocados would increase, causing prices to decrease. Look at the supply vs demand curve. They're inverse of one another. Basic econ
6) <span>the cost of luxury items like jewelry increases. if it's a luxury item, the supply will never increase; it will remain the same. but if there is less demand for it, then the cost will go up so that shop owners can pay off their bills.
7 and 8 aren't showing up for me so I think you typed too much in the problem.
Hope that helps. </span>
<u>Answer:
</u>
Chagnon experienced a culture shock at the sight of the customs and social environment that the Yanomamo tribe of South America practiced and lived in.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The extremely orthodox and bewildering practices that were followed by the people of the Yanomamo tribe disturbed anthropologist Chagnon.
- The conflicts among themselves and their habit of attacking each other was one reason that suffered a culture shock.
- He recorded the practices and the social environment of the tribe to be the strangest that he had ever experienced with any other tribe that he had come across.
Answer:
Weather and climate
Greece has a warm Mediterranean climate. In summer (June to August), dry hot days are often relieved by stiff evening breezes, especially in the north, on the islands and in coastal areas. Athens can be stiflingly hot, with temperatures occasionally exceeding 40°C (104°F) in July.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Answer:
b.159
Explanation:
The U.S state of georgia is divided into 159 counties more then any other state except for texas,which has 254 counties.
Relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians have been shaped not only by the theologies and beliefs of the three religions, but also, and often more strongly, by the historical circumstances in which they are found. As a result, history has become a foundation for religious understanding. In each historical phase, the definition of who was regarded as Muslim, Jewish, or Christian shifted, sometimes indicating only a religious identification, but more often indicating a particular social, economic, or political group.
While the tendency to place linguistic behaviour, religious identity, and cultural heritage under one, pure definition has existed for a very long time, our modern age with its ideology of nationalism is particularly prone to such a conflation. Ethnic identities have sometimes been conflated with religious identities by both outsiders and insiders, complicating the task of analyzing intergroup and intercommunal relations. For example, Muslims have often been equated with Arabs, effacing the existence of Christian and Jewish Arabs (i.e., members of those religions whose language is Arabic and who participate primarily in Arab culture), ignoring non-Arab Muslims who constitute the majority of Muslims in the world. In some instances, relations between Arabs and Israelis have been understood as Muslim-Jewish relations, ascribing aspects of Arab culture to the religion of Islam and Israeli culture to Judaism. This is similar to what happened during the Crusades, during which Christian Arabs were often charged with being identical to Muslims by the invading Europeans. While the cultures in which Islam predominates do not necessarily make sharp distinctions between the religious and secular aspects of the culture, such distinctions make the task of understanding the nature of relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians easier, and therefore will be used as an analytic tool in this chapter.
