Answer:
Endorsing a presidential candidate is more likely to be done by a national party than a local party.
Explanation:
This is because when it's local, it's usually in support of local elected officials. It has nothing to do with national officials. However, when it is a national party, they could endorse a presidential candidate because that is ultimately more important and affects all people- hence the national. This is because whoever is chosen in such an important election changes the future of a country, and is something national organizations should deal with- not local ones.
Answer : U.S supreme court
I hope that's help:0
Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
Answer:
A) judging, criticizing, and placing blame.
Explanation:
First of all, the social worker is not even considering the possibility that Andrew could have been fired without justification, or that he could get his job back, he is placing blame exclussively on the worker (Andrew).
Besides, he is judging Andrew as an alcoholic, or at least, as a person who has serious problems with alcohol consumption (so serious to the point of going to work drunk and being fired because of that), and finally, the social worker is criticizing the way Andrew is dealing with his possible alcoholism, because he is telling Andrew that he is not even Aware of what alcohol is doing to him.
High standards of living are defined when defining the state of evolution of the society
- in different periods of time considering cultural peculiarities
- comparing two by two of above mentioned states?
- considering the most important standards for a good living
So, we could say japan has a higher state of development then most countries cause techniquely they use their energy most efficiently, being quite a competitive part of the world
Cuba, on the other hand, lacks transparency and coordination in developing strategies , the hedonic needs being preserved and perpetuated by the cubans and the naturalised population, geopolical influences remaining to be looked into.
