According to B.F. Skinner, this most likely reflects a "<span>response tendency".
Skinner trusted that nature decides conduct or behavior. As per his view, individuals have steady conduct designs since they have specific sorts of response tendencies. This implies after some time, individuals figure out how to act specifically ways. Behaviors that have positive results tend to increment, while practices that have negative outcomes tend to diminish.
</span>
Answer:
b. diary method
Explanation:
Diary method: This is a research method that gathers qualitative information by keeping participants record entries of their everyday lives in a diary, journal, or log about the experience, or activity being studied.
It is composed of five-phase:
1. Planning and Preparation.
2. Pre-study brief.
3. Logging period.
4. Post-study interview.
5. Data Analysis.
Advantage: Events are recorded in their natural setting.
Disadvantage: The cost and time related to Participant recruitment.
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
I would say graphs, and diagrams
<span> Belshazzar's kingdom </span>will<span> be taken and divided. </span>
