1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sammy [17]
3 years ago
6

The subject has $8,000 pool and a $2,000 chimney but no porch. a comparable that sold for $199,000 has a $3,000 porch but no poo

l or chimney. assuming all else is equal, what is the adjusted value of the comparable?
Business
1 answer:
fenix001 [56]3 years ago
3 0
<span>If the comp sold for $199,000 but includes a $3000 porch and the subject has no porch, then we subtract the value of the porch to yield a base for the comparable of $196,000. Then, since the comparable has no pool or chimney, we add these values - $8,000 and $2,000, respectively - to that base value to yield an adjusted value of $196,000 + $8,000 + $2,000 = $206,000.</span>
You might be interested in
Which is a tax in which the percentage paid increases as income increases?
AleksAgata [21]
Progressive tax. Literally just reviewed this lesson in my econ class lol. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Investor Palmer has a diversified portfolio consisting of equity and debt valued at $365,000 at the start of the year. During th
garri49 [273]

Answer:

The return after taxes is 7.9%

Explanation:

At the start of the year the portfolio is valued at $365,000.

At the end, his portfolio has returns by dividends ($3,579), interests ($2,783) and portolio's valuation (389,648-365,000=$24,648).

The tax is applied to the dividends and interests, as:

Tax = 0.35 * (3579+2783) = 0.35*6362 = $2,226.70

We can then calculate the investor's return as

R = profit after taxes / initial portfolio valuation

R = ((3579 + 2783 - 2226.70)+24648)/365000

R= 28,783.30 / 365,000 = 0.079 = 7.9%

5 0
3 years ago
Choosing a differentiated targeting strategy has many​ benefits, but a potential downside is that​ __________.
Nesterboy [21]
<span>it requires a company or individual divide resources on multiple targets rather than one. Therefore, one must use these resources more efficiently because he or she is using the same amount, usually concentrated on one target, on multiple. A company should only use this strategy if it is extremely confident in its ability to market simultaneously to multiple groups.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
7.37 For the net cash flow series, (a) determine the number of possible i* values using the two sign tests, (b) find the EROR us
nlexa [21]

Answer:

The answer is 25.19% .

Note: The values were not stated for the net series cash flows, during my research and i found the complete question and solved it.

Explanation:

<em>From the question given,</em>

<em>The first step is to make use of a table for the net cash flow series</em>

<em>Year                      1                  2                3              4             5             6</em>

<em>Net cash flow    $4100   $2000         $7000         $12000  $700       $800</em>

<em>Then,</em>

<em>Solution : MIRR is defined as modified internal rate of return, It accounts for the positive cash flows with reinvestment by using re-investment rate and negative cash flows are calculated at their present values to keep the fund aside by using finance rate. </em>

<em> As given also reinvestment rate = 20% and finance cost rate = 10%. </em>

<em> Now, from the table given of cash flows, we will calculate the future value of all cash flows in year 6. </em>

<em> FV = 4100*(1+0.20)^5 + 12000*(1+0.20)^2 + 800*(1+0.20)^0 = $28282.11 </em>

<em> Now,</em>

<em> By applying the rate of   we will computer teh PV of -ve cash flows : </em>

<em> PV = -2000/(1+0.1)^2 + -7000/(1+0.1)^3 + -700/(1+0.1)^5 = -$7346.73 </em>

<em> Now MIRR can be calculated by using the formula , MIRR = \√[n]{FV(positive cash flows/PV of negative cash flows)}-1 = \√[6]{28282.11/7346.74)}-1 </em>

<em> MIRR = 1.2519-1 = 0.2519 or 25.19% </em>

<em> Therefore, the only value Possible = 25.19% in this case.</em>

5 0
3 years ago
You have an opportunity to invest in Australia at an interest rate of 8%. Moreover, you expect the Australian dollar (A$) to app
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

10.16%

Explanation:

The computation of the effective return for this investment is shown below:

Let us assume that we invested an amount in Australian dollars 100

The return is 8%

After one year, the amount is 108

Now the converting amount is 110.16 (108 × 102%)

Now the effective rate for this investment is

= 110.16 - 100

= 10.16%

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Horrified at the high price for the flu vaccine decides to set a price ceiling at $60.what are the results of this ceiling
    7·1 answer
  • A registered representative solicits an order from a customer to buy 200 shares of XYZZ at $50. The customer agrees and the regi
    15·1 answer
  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, an auction
    13·1 answer
  • A mortgage can best be defined as?
    8·1 answer
  • The newspaper reported last week that Bennington Enterprises earned $34.07 million this year. The report also stated that the fi
    5·1 answer
  • Look at the graph. A medical device company is selling a new diagnostic tool at the equilibrium price of $15. The company hires
    11·2 answers
  • SAT scores generally fall _____ points above or below a student's true ability.
    15·2 answers
  • When ivory started work at henderson textile co., she was amazed at its employees who would take thirty-minute restroom breaks,
    7·1 answer
  • Albert and his family sell beverages outside the stadium during local football matches. Local football matches take place every
    15·1 answer
  • Wilson Industries holds 100 Farley Enterprises bonds. The bonds pay $4,000 interest each July and January and will mature on Jan
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!