In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
All of the answers are correct, for the bibliographic entry you need their name, date, and the type of interview conducted.
Answer:
High
Low
Explanation:
When a company borrows funds it has opportunity to avail tax shield on the interest amount of the borrowing fund. If the company borrows more fund then the discounted value of tax shield will increase while the financial distress cost will decrease.
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
It was given that consumer prefers Adidas to puma brand soccer cleats but he buys puma brand soccer cleats. This is only because of the price theory and rational consumer choice. We know that a rational consumer will choose a product with a lower price. Both puma and Adidas brand soccer cleats are substitutes, thus, if the price of puma cleats is lower than the Adidas cleats then he should prefer puma brand soccer cleats.