1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
3 years ago
5

Discuss the issues in marbury v. madison and the power that the supreme court used in making its decision

History
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
6 0

Who was the most influential American of the founding era of the United States: George Washington, due to his military and political achievements? Thomas Jefferson, for the Declaration of Independence and the acquisition of the Louisiana Purchase? James Madison, for his "writing" of the Constitution and subsequent service in the House of Representatives, as Secretary of State, and President? Or might it be John Marshall, who served as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court for 34 years, longer than any other Chief Justice, and whose ground-breaking decisions still affect the lives of every American?

It is safe to say that as Madison was the "father" of the Constitution and Washington the "father of the powers of the Presidency," Marshall was the "father of the Supreme Court," almost single-handedly clarifying its powers.

What if the Supreme Court did not have the power to review laws or executive decisions, to overturn those that are "unconstitutional"? How different might life be in the United States? Until 1803, it was not a foregone conclusion that the Supreme Court of the United States would have that power, despite the fact that judicial review had its origins in early seventeen-century England and had been asserted by James Otis in the period leading up to the American Revolution. A relatively minor lawsuit led to one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history, Marbury v. Madison, laying the foundation for the Court's ability to render its decisions about laws and actions. In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court claimed the power to review acts of Congress and the president and deem them unconstitutional, creating a precedent for an American process of judicial review. Through the decision of Chief Justice John Marshall, then, the court assumed the powers with which it has since played such a vital role in American life.

This lesson is designed to help students understand Marshall's strategy in issuing his decision, the significance of the concept of judicial review, and the language of this watershed case.

You might be interested in
How did the Great Compromise support the idea of federalism?
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

It divided power between the federal government and state government

3 0
3 years ago
True or false <br><br><br><br> Please help!
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

to the first one it would be false

Explanation:

great brittin  has no control over us now but it did when the pilgrams came over to America

4 0
3 years ago
What does this cartoon indicate about the relationship between the United States and the newly-independent Latin American countr
AVprozaik [17]

The correct answer is "The United States hoped to benefit from problems in Latin America.".

Latin American governments are considered as "faulty democracies" or "pseudo-democracies", as government institutions are constantly threated by external fights for power.

Latin America is also a region with many resources, therefore, by aiding governments in this region. The United States lays a path to good relationships with the regimes that will result in ease in trade relations and foreign investment by private American Enterprises in these countries.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the continental system influence subsequent events in Europe and around the world
irina1246 [14]

The Continental System was a decree by the Emperor of France, Napoleon Bonaparte which was made to limit British trade and bankrupt the country.

At his mightiest, Napoleon controlled almost every powerful country in Europe, except for Britain and Russia. He found it difficult to directly attack Britain and instead wanted to bankrupt it.

However, this eventually backfired and left France in a very bad economic conditions and Britain took advantage of this.  

Many smaller countries that France had annexed, took up arms against Napoleon and began to fight. With a weakened economic position, Napoleon eventually lost the Empire.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The migration of poles who sought improvement in their lives was known as ________.
Vladimir79 [104]
The migration is known as "<span>Za Chlebem", which in English language is translated as "For Bread".
As it is obvious from the name that this migration was in search of a better life, it mainly consisted those Polish immigrants who in Poland had no basics of lives neither did they own any land to support themselves.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4.Why was Carnegie Steel considered a vertical monopoly? A.The company controlled every step of steel production, from raw mater
    10·2 answers
  • Who was the Apostle Paul and what role did he play in founding Christianity ?
    6·1 answer
  • What happens if no candidate receives at least 270 votes from the electoral college conduct research of secondary sources to ass
    5·1 answer
  • Is the world more or less vulnerable today than in 2001? Give 1 specific reason.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements accurately describes the incan economy
    6·1 answer
  • 1. How do ideas change the way people live?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain what happened in Marbury v. Madison.
    10·1 answer
  • #1) The trade illustrated by the map contributed most directly to which of the
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Hussein invade Kuwait?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the 13th amendment important? how was it important?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!