Her essay is the persuasive type of essay. Hope I was of any help!
Answer:
The speaker (Shakespeare) in the sonnet praises his beloved by comparing his beloved to a “summer’s day is explained below in details.
Explanation:
Sonnet 18 is complicated and, at one level, it is as explained in the statement preceding. The nature of its opportunity quatrain is, admittedly, positive but, correspondingly disappointed by the restrictions of the sonnet custom and tradition and its application of stock comparisons, to display a love which the lover appears to surpass.
Answer: Is there a story or something?
Answer:
Exactly what it says. We are all the same, in different ways
Explanation:
Like, we are all the same species. Right? Human. We all have human nature, instincts, and we all have eyes, ear, and noses (unless you've lost some, unfortunately. But you were most likely born with them!) But we have different temperaments, attitudes, opinions, and we look different. We talk different. But it's in our nature to look for friends, to want to be liked by others, and to be happy in general. But depending on how we were raised, our <em>morals </em>fluctuate and we change and are shaped by what goes on around us. But at our base, we're human. We have different cultures, but we each <em>have </em>culture (if that makes sense.) We have different versions of the same things. For example, every country has their own form of bread. It may be a tortilla, or pasta, or whatever, but it's <em>bread. </em>The same, but different in many ways.
<em>(Hope that helps and made sense!)</em>
Both authors of "In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" chose the same historical event as the setting but these books shows the World War 1 from two absolutely different points of view. "In Flanders Fields" author praises and blesses all those warriors who protected their native land fighted for it and its future generations. While reading this story you feel persuasive tone that aimed to make you feel the same. "Dulce et Decorum Est!" shows the most appalling things that happened during the War and urges us that if we had ever been through It all it would have been the worst nightmare in our life. To conclude : in the first story author eulogizes War whereas the second warns against it.
