Answer:
Skepticism
Explanation:
Skepticism is the process in which a person usually doubt or holds a disbelief because of lack of any scientific proof. It can also be defined as a process of reasoning and critical thinking to analyze whether a notion or idea is valid or not. In other words, we can say that skepticism is the process that leads to a supported conclusion and not just mere justification of it.
<u>In the given case, the faculty of the college should use the characteristics of skepticism. Because this process will help them come to a supported conclusion to identify students who may succeed in the science course</u>.
So, the correct answer is Skepticism.
Answer:
1. 42-1 = 41 38-1 = 37
2.
Explanation:
You take away 42 from 1 which will give you 41 and take away 38 from 1 which will give you 37
Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
Answer:
PERSONALITY , MEDICAL SCHOOL EXAM
Explanation:
In this context, Gerry's PERSONALITY is the diathesis and the MEDICAL SCHOOL EXAM is the stressor.
Diathesis is that part in us which are prone to medical disorder, and the stressor is the factors that contributes to the disorder.
Panic attacks in a person is caused by personality disorder, and in this situation, it is triggered by the pressure of the exam.
