The argument that a law should not be followed because it violates the inherent rights of human beings follows the natural law theory of jurisprudence.
Natural law is a legal system based on a close observation of human nature and on the values inherent in human nature that can be derived and applied independently of positive law (explicitly enacted laws of the state or society). According to natural law theory, all human beings have inherent rights, which are conferred by "God, nature, or reason" rather than by juridical acts.
Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality." It assumes that you believe that killing others is wrong and that punishment for killing others is right.
Learn more about Natural law here: brainly.com/question/11298929
#SPJ4
Explanation:
1glml. ...................
Answer:
Government instability leads to humanitarian crises. It negatively impacts the economy, resulting in increased poverty. The disruption of food supplies results in famine. In Somalia and Sudan, for example, more than millions of people have died from starvation and disease, and millions more have fled these areas and are living as refugees. There is not enough money to deal with health care issues. More people suffer from a lack of clean water supplies. In Africa, it means there is less money to fight diseases, such as malaria or the HIV/AIDS epidemic, and Africa has among the highest infection rates in the world.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
The correct answer is one's language determines the pattern of one's thinking and view of the world.
The principle of linguistic relativity postulates that the way in which a language is structured affects the cognition of its speakers - which directs, inhibits and shapes their worldview. It is also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is commonly divided into two versions: one more extreme and one less extreme; or it can be understood as being part of a spectrum. I prefer to think of it as a spectrum.
At one end of the spectrum, the theory states that language determines cognition. It is also known as linguistic determinism. Linguistic determinism proposes that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories - in other words, the way we think is a product of the language we speak, and our language can allow or prevent us from thinking in certain ways. At the other end of the spectrum, the theory holds that language only influences cognition, but does not determine it - so the way we think is guided by our language, but we are able to think in ways that are not always determined by our native language .