All categories

3 years ago

Tax cuts increase consumer incentive to save. which determinant(s) of aggregate demand cause the change?

1 answer:

8 0

In the given problem above, what will most likely happen if the tax cuts increase consumer incentive to save is that the aggregate demand will likely change as it will increase in the given situation, mainly because of the tax cut in which it will consume or spend the money earned.

You might be interested in

Which of the following would help reduce the amount of frictional unemployment? Choose one or more: A. Websites that advertise j

Natali [406]

Answer:E. Websites that advertise job openings across the country

Explanation:

Frictional unemployment is a natural kind of unemployment when people are out of jobs temporally maybe because they left their unfulfilling jobs or their residential area has changed after they got married .

Some will leave their jobs because they are no longer happy and they have saved enough to survive whilst still searching for the jobs.

Some will leave because they have to take care of their loved ones until those relatives get better and they can return to the working industry.

These people can make use of the website to search for their next job.

3 0

3 years ago

The quality of a soil is most directly related to ________.

Illusion [34]

Its capacity to perform the functions you or a person want it to

5 0

2 years ago

Cartels are difficult to maintain because a. the monopoly output is very difficult to determine. b. the number of firms is alw

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

The correct answer is option d.

Explanation:

Cartels are generally formed in oligopoly markets. In such markets there are few firms which are interdependent. So, they form cartels to enjoy monopoly power.

Though cartels are generally short lived and difficult to maintain. The reason behind this is that each firm has the incentive to deviate and produce more than their quota in order to capture more market share.

So, option d is the correct answer here.

6 0

3 years ago

"Clauss Company transfers out 14,000 units and has 2,000 units of ending work in process that are 25% complete. Materials are en

diamong [38]

Answer:

a. $112,000

b. $7,500

Explanation:

(a) transferred out

Units transferred out are 100% complete for both materials and conversion costs, thus multiply the Total Cost per Equivalent units with the number of units transferred.

Cost of units transferred out = $8 × 14,000 units

= $112,000

(b) in ending work in process

Units of ending work in process are 100% complete in terms of materials ( since materials are entered at the beginning of the process) whilst 25% complete in terms on conversion cost (applied uniformly during production).

Cost of ending work in process

Materials ($3 × 2,000 units) = $6,000

Conversion ($3 × (2,000 units × 25%)) = $1,500

Total Cost = $7,500

6 0

3 years ago

Let S(x) denote "x obeys the speed limit," where the domain is the set of all drivers. Express the negation of the proposition "

Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

Using Quantifiers: ¬∃x¬S(x)≡ ∀xS(x)

English Language: All drivers obey the speed limit

Explanation:

The domain is the set of all drivers i.e. the domain of drivers

Let S(x) be the predicate “x obeys the speed limit.”

The above statement can be written as ∃x¬S(x),

The negation is represented by ¬∃x¬S(x)≡ ∀xS(x)

In English Language, it is ->, all drivers obey the speed limit

8 0

2 years ago