According to functional job analysis, all jobs require workers to interact with data, people, and things. There are different ways to conduct a functional job analysis, but these ways measure workplace roles through established scales. These scales are usually categorized into seven categories: data, people, things, instruction, reasoning, math, and language.
Functional job analysis is the practice of examining job requirements and assigning a suitable candidate for that job or examining a candidate's qualifications and skills and assigning a suitable job to that candidate. It also works in reverse by not matching the wrong candidate with the job or vice versa. An obvious example is not hiring someone with no hands to do any job that requires lifting things. With only two types of jobs in a small business, this is not a difficult proposition. In a large company with thousands of people doing hundreds of different jobs, it can become a Gordian knot. It is up to the functional job analyst to become Alexander with the sword.
Learn more about functional job analysis:
brainly.com/question/24239905
#SPJ4
Answer:
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= 3.223 Times
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= 3.91 times
Explanation:
Inventory Turnover Ratio= Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventories
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= $632,000/ $201,000
+ 191,100/2
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= $632,000/196,050
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= 3.223 times
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= $ 731,000/191,100
+ 182,600/2
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= $ 731,000/ 186,850
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= 3.91 times
Answer:
to find profit make
%profit =selling price + cost price ÷ cost price
Answer:
C. the greater the value of the multiplier
Explanation:
As we know that
The formula to compute the Government spending multiplier is shown below:
Government spending multiplier = 1 ÷ (1 - marginal propensity to consume)
where,
Marginal propensity to consume refers to the change in consumption with regard to the change in income
So if the value of the marginal propensity to consume is higher than there would also increase in the value of the multiplier and in the same proportion it would be greater
<span>Teenagers and young adults are more likely to view social networks as a valuable source of information. additionally, making products modern and convenient makes marketing to teens much more effective.</span>
