The correct answers are options #2 and 3.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man was a French document in which male citizens established what natural rights they have. This was very similar to the American Declaration of Independence, which was made 13 years before the Declaration of the Rights of Man.
Within this document, the French established that men are born equal and free, that people should be employed based on their skill set, and the ability to do what they want so long as they do not hurt others (like practice their own religion).
This was one of several documents during the late 1800's that established rights that all citizens should have within a country.
The Anasazi lived in the 4 corners region (Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico)
The orange area in this picture.
The Federalists said that fixing the Articles of Confederation wasn't enough and just making a new document would be better.
The Articles of Confederation was ratified in 1781 and is known to be very weak. These Articles gave little to no power to the federal government. They could not tax citizens, create or enforce laws properly, draft soldiers, or regulate trade. Everything was entirely up to the states which meant they were barely ever on the same page.
The Anti-Federalists preferred the Articles of Confederation. They did not want a strong government and even associated it with British tyranny. They felt as if individual rights were more important. On the other hand, the Federalists thought the Articles of Confederation was too weak and was doing more harm than good. They thought that in order to have a strong country, they needed to have a strong government.
Eventually, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called in order to fix the Articles of Confederation. Obviously, this did not happen and the Articles ended up getting scraped all together and the United States Constitution was created. The Anti-Federalists obviously were not happy with this, but the Bill of Rights was created to protect the rights of the people and prevent the government from abusing their power.
In the range and complexity of its proposals, President Nixon's annual message on the environment reflects the growing sophistication of what he properly calls “the environmental awakening.” From urban parks to agricultural pesticides, from wetlands to treatment of industrial wastes, the problems of the environment are many‐sided and their solutions are interdependent.
