Answer:
okay i am iffy about this one im not sure i know that i believe it was 1959 they passed a law for free education or healthcare. i know food rations is an iffy one but i think tey provide that even for people with money. im gonna say food rations
Explanation:
Answer:
no power to compel obedience if one state invaded another there was nothing to repelling the invasion
The term authoritarian is defined as the enforcing or favoring strict obedience to authority with the personal freedom being at expanse.
This term can be used for people that do have high authority, be it in the politics, economy, military...
Usually, something that is ruled by a person that is authoritarian ends up badly for everyone, as most of the people that are bellow that person in the hierarchy suffer, and eventually they get sick of it and take down that person.
Usually the term is used for leaders of countries in more recent times, where we have leaders that have absolute power in their countries, everyone has to obey them, and they rule with iron fist. Some examples of the near past are Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Tito, Castro, while from the present day its Kim Jong Un, Berdimuhamedow, Myint...
The authoritarians come in the form of dictator, tyrant, despot, absolutist, autocrat.
Answer:
because law was that could not be free unless the person who owned them gave them a paper that lets them be free.
Explanation:
Answer:
Each country is required to have a set of institutions which are present there in order to make some decision while they are chasing some military, political, or economical related objective or goal. As there are different factors inside any civilization or we can say nation that makes a great impact while the countries or nations are passing through any situation.
- As,there were a number of institutions and state departments inside the US who were supposed or intended to protect each citizen of the US. As the military was not supposed to fight against its own people in the southern states but happened, and very unfortunately the United State's military took greater part in fighting against the tribes and other opposition forces who had the conservative mindset.
- So, some times the institutions which are meant to protect and develop a nation as whole turns out to be fighting against there own inside the region. As they are assembled by a few number of individuals who are then termed as war hero's fighting against there own.
